That's fine by me! I approved a couple of the things I saw in my email inbox and was scratching my head wondering if it had always been moderated and I'd forgotten. :)
I can kind of guess your reasons for doing this, and I approve.
I want to ask you how you feel about this rule, which has been in place since the beginning:
"4. All content must be rated. Use any popular rating system you'd like, but ratings must clearly state a suggested minimum age level (i.e., NC-17). Any story that has a rating higher than PG-13 must be posted under friends lock."
If elricsexual becomes a high-traffic comm (or, hell, any ANY traffic comm), I'd like to know if you think this is a reasonable restriction, or if you think that clear labels and LJ-cuts for contents are sufficient. Because, uh... there are a couple of posts up currently (including one by you!) with explicit ratings that are not under lock. And I don't know whether I should care about this or just let it go... and perhaps change the rule to be a bit more people-friendly. ♥
I think that's fine, I'm just a doofus head and I've totally forgotten to lock them because I forgot that was a major rule. What a good mod am I! I think it's fair, and I'll take care of that right away.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-24 11:10 pm (UTC)I can kind of guess your reasons for doing this, and I approve.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-24 11:43 pm (UTC)"4. All content must be rated. Use any popular rating system you'd like, but ratings must clearly state a suggested minimum age level (i.e., NC-17). Any story that has a rating higher than PG-13 must be posted under friends lock."
If
no subject
Date: 2006-04-25 02:26 am (UTC)